It’s time to start planning for new certified staff MacBooks! As I said in my previous post, we plan to update about 25% of the staff fleet each year. When we started this back in 2014, all staff had computers that were all the same age. So, as a starting point, we choose CCSD seniority as the fairest way we could think of to get the process rolling. This is the last year of the model. Next year, we’ll be looking at computer age, not your age with the district to determine who gets an update.
Here’s the list for this summer. Please note, if you scroll down beyond the current year, the value in the “SenDate” column (column E) may not be correct. This is because we are in the last year of looking at this from a seniority perspective. We do have you ordered correctly, by computer age — so while the date in that column may not be correct, your placement in the replacement cohort is. Next year’s Sheet will show only computer age, but we can’t have two values in the same column. It will look better next year! I know this a little confusing, but again, don’t worry about the date, just know your place in the cohort is where it should be.
If you are on the list to get an update this summer, Angela will be emailing you to setup a time this summer to get this done. The email will share the dates and the process for this to happen. Again, if you are on the list, please take some time to read and complete the Form in that email from Angela. I would strongly suggest backing up everything you wish to transfer to Google Drive. If you do that and use Chrome, this makes the process go a lot faster. In fact, by doing these two things, we can usually just setup Chrome for and that’s all it takes. As always, let me know if you have questions or comments.
While there are still some questions marks, I can share some of the technology team’s plans for the summer. We intend to stick to the device plan we started back in 2014. This means around 60 Chromebooks for each elementary building — intended for 3rd grade. We’ll update 25% of our student MacBook fleet as well as 25% of our staff MacBook fleet (more on that in another upcoming post).
One piece of feedback I’ve gotten quite often is that we don’t have great tools for kids that use Chromebooks to edit video. So, I’m excited to announce we’ll be adding a district subscription to WeVideo this summer! WeVideo is an easy to use web-based video editing tool. I’ll share more detail and learning opportunities for it as we move into next summer and fall. But, this will give all kids at Prairie a common tool they can use to create and edit video content.
Of course, one of the other main projects we’ll be working on is the ongoing update to Prairie High School, too. We’ll be installing new network gear in all of the areas slated to open in the fall. With our standard summer work, this projects to be a very productive summer season for the team. As always, drop me a line or leave a comment here if you have questions.
For those of you who enjoy podcasts (If you’ve not listened before this might be a good weekend to do so!), there’s a new episode of Friendly Disruption. In this episode, Maggie, Patrick, and I visit with Ruth Ziolkowski, president of Don Johnston Software. The conversation focused on how digital tools can provide greater student agency and advocacy.
Read and Write has so many awesome features! One that I haven’t shared here yet is the Dictionary and Picture Dictionary. The brief video above gives a great description of what each tool does and how you might consider using them with kids.
Here’s another excellent, short video from Google on app integration into Google Classroom. The discuss how tools and apps like Khan Academy, Ed Puzzle, and Workbench nicely integrate into Classroom. If you have questions, drop me a line. I would also encourage you to add your favorite apps you integrate to both their YouTube channel and to this blog.
There is a new episode of Friendly Disruption now available for those of you who enjoy podcasts. This month we talk in depth about optical text recognition (OCR) software — the tools teachers can use to make paper text into digital text. We also have a great conversation about universal design for learning (UDL) and personalized learning with Noreen Bush.
IPI (Instructional Practices Inventory) is part of the CCSD Strategic Plan under Focus 3. The goal is that 30% of our IPI observations will reflect higher order, deeper thinking. In the IPI model, a code 6 or 5 indicates higher order thinking. One of the big concepts of IPI is that even though the observations are very short (5 minutes or less) the sheer number of observations will reveal a clear trend of what kids are experiencing. Just a couple of important reminders regarding IPI:
IPI is NOT evaluative of individual teachers in any way. All the data is aggregated. No one looks at individual classrooms or teachers. We don’t care which classrooms or teachers were revealed with specific codes. It’s all about looking at the overall trend of the big picture.
IPI is not a hierarchy. With the exceptions of codes 1 and code 2 — which we should do our best eliminate: disengaged students and teachers — the rest of the codes are all valuable and good practice. We don’t want to see an elimination of codes 3 or 4 — the lower order thinking codes. Kids need these types of experiences to fully and deeply learn. The big question is what proportion of codes 3, 4, 5, and 6 do we think is optimal…?
Here are some of the highlights when I look our data:
During the winter district IPI window, we were able to get in just under a thousand (989) observations. This data represents all buildings except Edge and Delta.
We had 25.5% of our total observations reflected students engaged in higher order, deeper thinking. In the fall window, we had 22.7%. So, there was an increase of 3.5% in students engaged in higher order, deeper thinking.
Of the 989 observations, 325 of them captured students using digital tools. This about 34% of all observations.
In observations with students using digital tools, 33.6 of these observations reflected students engaged in higher order, deeper thinking. In the observations without technology or digital tools, students were engaged in higher order, deeper thinking in 20.4% of those observations. This is a difference of 13.2%
Code 4 represents direct teacher instruction and code 3 represents independent (lower order) practice. Students not engaged with technology/digital tools were coded at 59.5% Students that were observed using digital tools were at code 3 51.7% of the time.
I think there’s a good bit celebrate. The fact that we have a pretty comprehensive and useful number of overall observations is great. Our total percentage of students observed engaging in higher order, deeper thinking has increased from the fall observation cycle. In addition, we are over our stated goal of 30% of students engaged in higher order, deeper thinking when students are engaged with digital tools (33.6%). That’s really powerful!
I think there are some “grows” in this data as well. I’d love to see the percentage of kids observed using digital tools go up from 34%. Looking at the data, it’s pretty clear that when our kids use these tools, they are significantly more likely (13.2%) to be engaged in higher order, deeper thinking.
I looking forward to our final observation cycle later this spring. I hope that all teachers get a chance to engage with this powerful data for your building. While it’s really interesting for me to analyze it, it’s really only useful or meaningful as a conversation starter amongst teachers and building leaders about how to shift the experience of our students.
I realized that most people probably don’t know what’s happening with online registration. So, here’s a quick update. If you all recall, when I came to your building last fall I announced that we would be going to online registration this year. This plan is moving ahead as expected. We’ve been using the new online form for all new to the district students this calendar year. While there are always some bugs and wrinkles to iron out, by an large it has worked really well. The new process has been relatively easy for families to understand and it’s saved Becky O’Connell a lot of time by automating most of the data entry into Campus — so far a real win-win situation.
This puts us on target to use the online tool for all returning district students this summer. Like any new process, I’m sure we’ll have some things we need to fix, but my hope is that this new tool will delight our families. The application for existing families just requires them to review the information we currently have in Campus and update it with any changes. This means no more completing the dreaded “yellow form” from scratch for each child. It should be a time-saver.
While there are still a number of details to work through, I can tell everyone that we will still have a registration event this August, too. It will likely look a bit different as all families will need to use the new tool. So, I’m sure we’ll have computer kiosks set up for families for that purpose. We will likely need to work with buildings as well to have some open computer times for families without access to the internet to use our equipment and connection to complete this process. Again, more details will be forthcoming on this. But, everything is on the right track. Stay tuned!
This was another take away from ATIA. This is an older video, but if you have not seen it, please budget the 18 minutes to watch it. Rose makes a compelling case for personalized learning. I’m hearted by the vision and goals in the CCSD Strategic Plan. We are going down the right track! But, Rose also challenged me with the concept that our instructional designs and environments are disabled and not our learners.